I love to hear other people’s philosophies. It only reinforces my belief that people are lazy and stupid. Listening to the average Joe’s take on life, death and the after life would be equivalent of having a 3 year old child explain the relativity theorem. People for reasons beyond me; formulate ideas that don’t make any logical sense. Here are a couple of examples to help illustrate. This one is from a girl that I met at a party, her beliefs went along the lines of, “the quality of your soul is determined by how much a sexual deviant you are”, and then there’s this guy I met who felt, “there is no God or Creator, There is only the grim reaper that has dominion over all.” Lastly, the most irritating of them all, “I only believe in Satan, God and Jesus are farces”. The only conclusion I’ve come too for this behaviour is their desperate need to individuate themselves or, to avoid labels that misconstrue the meaning. This is where a book might have helped them, seeing as it’s up too the individual to explicitly detail your beliefs so there is no confusion. Think it’s a tedious task? Not at all, these are your fundamental beliefs; it only helps you if you can articulate it clearly and understand it. To individuate yourself based on your ideas, well this is folly on two grounds. One, your ideas are already unique to you, by sharing your unique idea you’ve made it a common thing. Two, your ideas are just imperfect and misunderstood playoffs of all the enlightened thinkers before you. Not only are you sharing a taint and ugly philosophy, it isn’t your philosophy to ruin in the first place. You don’t even have the right to manipulate or change these ideas, you’ve put no research into them, you don’t even know how to properly analyse the idea. These people are especially irritating because they usually frown on the people who follow religion blindly. News flash genius, not everyone follows a religion blindly. Most decide to read the bible and understand its philosophical value. A stark contrast to the philosophies you half made all on your own. Stick to reading Winnie the Pooh or something by Robert Much, these have sociological and psychological implications even you can grasp. Such as, “what you look like doesn’t count for much compared to who you are”. That’s the average Joe, now let’s talk teenager. Most teens take a drunken stab in the dark when it comes to philosophy. This is in direct relation to the fact most teens can’t explain what exactly it is to be a “Goth”, an “Emo”, or a “Prep”. Most teens today are atheists or so they believe, because they reason it is foolish to follow a religion blindly. Again atheism is a religion and it takes more insight than just not believing in God to be a true atheist. But that aside, they are probably part of a subculture mentioned above or one that I didn’t. They follow this trend with the stead fast determination of a retard running into a wall. Asking them anything remotely profound about the beliefs and idiosyncrasies of their particular sub-culture all you get is the sure sign response of a moron. It’s that “Aaaah” and “Uuumm” sound, trademark to the class dunce. If you happen to come a cross and unusually spry individual with wit to match; the individual is then found to be a hypocrite. As it would be absolutely absurd to want to belong to a group of mislead sheep. I would find it baffling why anyone with a cognizant thought would want to limit their possibilities by limiting their character to one dimension. Off topic but it’s still one of my hatreds that relate to philosophy. Words are a big part of philosophy, without them it would be challenging to convey my grandiose ideas. This is where the average is an utter deterrent for philosophy by creating implications and connotations to every word. They also bastardize a word to the extent of changing or modifying its intended meaning. Such as, like. This word was originally used to define an akin relationship or similar to. However, over time it has adopted the ability to define a fondness towards something or someone; it is even accepted as a filler word. “I like had a complete breakdown the other day. He like gave me a strange look and I was like “omg” and he like didn’t like that…”. Writing that almost made me vomit on myself, and as a philosopher addict the last thing I need is people mucking up or destroying valuable words for me to use. An extensive vocabulary is wonderful, but not everyone understands it and I like even the dim witted to know how much I hate them. This is applicable for anyone who wants to comment. As I have decided to share my enmity with you all, I would much appreciate it if you refrained from leaving comments that just make me hate you all the more. Should you have anything complacent, praising or in accordance to what I have written, don’t write it to me. You can’t possible fathom how little I care what you worms have to say. Of course you agree with me, I’m always right, and I care little for your praise as you have little or no credibility to make it of any value. For you self-righteous folks, I fume nothing but ire for you. You continually attack my hatreds with your pretentious beliefs, when there really is no good argument that can logically prove an irrational emotion such as hate. So why do you all persist in showing me how ill witted you are in trying to forsake my hate? Don’t answer that, it’s a writing device called a rhetorical question. It’s more a statement than a question, see if you’re clever enough to figure it out. That felt good, I’ve had writer block for weeks. I had so much pent up rage I couldn’t put focus to it. I thought I was going to burst. Hurray for the idiots! They help keep me from killing all you ignorant tools.